in G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth
Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,pp.
166-170. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Darden, L. (1976). “Reasoning in Scientific Change:
Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries, and the Discovery of
Segregation,” Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science7:127-169.
Darden, L. (1980). “Theory Construction in Genetics,” in T.
Nickles (Ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies.
Dordrecht: Reidel.
Darden, L. (1982). “Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of
Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction,”
in T. Nickles & P. Asquith (Eds.), PSA 1982,V. 2, pp.
147-165. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science
Association.
Darden, L. (1985). “Hugo de Vries’s Lecture Plates and the
Discovery of Segregation,” Annals of Science42:233-242.
Darden, L. (1987). “Viewing the History of Science as
Compiled Hindsight,” AI Magazine8(2):33-41.
Darden, L. (1990). “Diagnosing and Fixing Faults in
Theories,” in J. Shrager & P. Langley (Eds.),
Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory
Formation.San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann.
Darden, L. (1991). Theory Change in Science: Strategies
from Mendelian Genetics.New York: Oxford University
Press.
Darden, L. (1992). “Strategies for Anomaly Resolution,” in
R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Science.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Darden, L. (1995). “Exemplars, Abstractions, and
Anomalies: Representations and Theory Change in
Mendelian and Molecular Genetics,” in J. G. Lennox & G.
Wolters (Eds.), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the
Biological Sciences.Pittsburgh, PA: University of
Pittsburgh Press.
Darden, L. (1997). “Anomaly-Driven Theory Redesign:
Computational Philosophy of Science Experiments,” in T.
W. Bynum & J. Moor (Eds.), Digital Phoenix: How
Computers are Changing Philosophy.Oxford: Blackwell.
Darden, L. (Ed.) (1996). PSA 1996,Proceedings of the 1996
Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Part I: Contributed Papers, Philosophy of
Science,Supplement to Volume 63, September 1996.
Darden, L. (Ed.) (1997). PSA 1996,Proceedings of the 1996
Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science
Association, Part II: Symposium Papers, Philosophy of
Science,Supplement to Volume 64, forthcoming
September 1997.
Darden, L. & Rada, R. (1988). “Hypothesis Formation
Using Part-Whole Interrelations,” in David Helman (Ed.),
Analogical Reasoning.Dordrecht: Reidel.
Darden, L. & Rada, R. (1988). “Hypothesis Formation Via
Interrelations,” in Armand Prieditis (Ed.), Analogica.Los
Altos, California: Morgan Kaufmann.
Darden, L., Moberg, D., Nagarajan, S. & Josephson, J.
(1991). Anomaly Driven Redesign of a Scientific Theory:
The TRANSGENE.2 Experiments(Tech. Rep. 91-LD-
TRANSGENE). Columbus, OH: Laboratory for Artificial
Intelligence Research, Ohio State University.
|
Darden, L., Moberg, D., Thadani, S. & Josephson, J.
(1992). A Computational Approach to Scientific Theory
Revision: The TRANSGENE Experiments(Tech. Rep.
92-LD-TRANSGENE). Columbus, OH: Laboratory for
Artificial Intelligence Research, Ohio State University.
Darden, L. & Cook, M. (1994). “Reasoning Strategies in
Molecular Biology: Abstractions, Scans and Anomalies,”
in D. Hull, M. Forbes, & R. M. Burian (Eds.), PSA
1994,v. 2, pp. 179-191. East Lansing, Michigan:
Philosophy of Science Association.
Dunbar, K. (1993). “Concept Discovery in a Scientific
Domain,” Cognitive Science17:397-434.
Dunbar, K. (1995). “How Scientists Really Reason:
Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories,” in R. J.
Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dunbar, K. (1996). “Beyond the Myth of The Lone
Scientist: Distributed Reasoning in Science and Scientific
Discovery,” Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese
Cognitive Science Society3:24-26.
Dunbar, K. (forthcoming). “How Scientists Think: On-line
Creativity and Conceptual Change in Science,” in T. B.
Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual
Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and
Change.Washington, D. C.: American Psychological
Association Press.
Eddy, S. R. (1996). “Hidden Markov Models,” from
ftp://genome.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/hmm-review.ps.Z
Fayyad, U., Djorgovski, S. G., & Weir, N. (1996). “From
Digitized Images to Online Catalogs,” AI Magazine17
(2): 51-66.
Fayyad, U., Haussler, D. & Stolorz, Z. (1996). “KDD for
Science Data Analysis: Issues and Examples,” In
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96),pp. 50-
56. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P. (1996).
“From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in
Databases,” AI Magazine17 (3): 37-54.
Griffith, T. W., Nersessian, N. & Goel, A. (1996). The
Role of Generic Models in Conceptual Change(Tech.
Rep. CIT-GOGSCI-96/02). Atlanta, GA: College of
Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Holyoak, K. J. and Thagard, P. (1995). Mental Leaps:
Analogy in Creative Thought.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT
Press.
Hunter, L. (Ed.) (1993). Artificial Intelligence and Molecular
Biology.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
de Jong, H. & Rip, A. (1997, forthcoming). “The Computer
Revolution in Science: Steps towards the Realization of
Computer-Supported Discovery Environments,” Artificial
Intelligence91(2).
Josephson, J.R. & Josephson, S.G. (Eds.) (1994).
Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy,
Technology.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karp, P. (1989). Hypothesis Formation and Qualitative
Reasoning in Molecular Biology.Ph.D. Dissertation,
Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Karp, P. (1990). “Hypothesis Formation as Design,” in J.
Shrager and P. Langley (Eds.), Computational Models of
|