Biochemistry III
Dr. Julin
Merle Zimmermann
May 12, 2003
Using a Virus to Correct a Genetic Defect [Internet Version]
The Story:
Research, a virus, X-SCID, treatments.
A team of researchers in France conducted an experiment where they cured several children suffering from X-linked severe combined immune deficiency (X-SCID) using a manmade retrovirus. The virus used in the experiment was a modified murine leukemia virus (MLV) that contained a corrected version of the gene that causes X-SCID (1). X-SCID is a disease that results in an immune system that is unable to fight off infections. The T-cells of X-SCID patients do not have normal gamma-c cytokine receptors (9), which causes them to die earlier than normal T-cells. The current treatment for the disease is to give bone marrow transplants to the affected patients, providing them with white blood cells that express the receptor protein correctly (2). This method, although effective, is sometimes difficult or impossible to do because it requires finding a donor with matching bone marrow (3). The advantages of the retroviral method are that it does not require a suitable and willing bone marrow donor or the drug treatments that a transplant requires.
A Spontaneous Recovery:
A chance mutation, the goal of the experiment.
In one of the X-SCID patients studied before the experiment in (1), a chance mutation resulted in a bone marrow cell with a semifunctional gamma-c cytokine receptor. This cell was much healthier than the cells with the defective gene, and it eventually repopulated its host's entire immune system, partially curing them of X-SCID. The goal of the researchers' experiment was to effect this same solution without relying on random (and extremely unlikely) mutations.
The Experiment:
Extraction, Infection, and Reintroduction.
The basic outline of the experiment was simple: First, bone marrow cells were removed from the patients. These cells were then infected in vitro with a modified recombinant virus that contained a normal gamma-c cytokine receptor gene. Finally, the altered cells were then reintroduced into the patients. The infected cells showed a higher survivability than the X-SCID cells, and they replaced the cells in the patient over the course of half a year (1).
How was the recombinant virus designed?
A wild virus, different genes, reverse transcription, modification, and a trick. The actual sequence.
The virus used in the experiment was a Moloney murine leukemia virus (MLV). This family of virus is widely studied and used because it is native to mice. The wild-type of the virus only infects mice, but there are strains that also infect cells from other species (see later).
The wild-type MLV contains three genes which, when expressed, make proteins that wrap the virus for transportation and reverse-transcribe it into the host DNA once it reaches the host cell. Reverse transcription is a process in which a protein translates RNA into DNA and inserts it into a preexisting DNA molecule. The name comes from the fact that DNA is usually translated into RNA before protein expression, and in this case the opposite process occurs. Reverse transcription is not uncommon; most of the human genome consists of copies of old reverse transcriptase genes, and recently genes of similar (non)function have appeared in fruit flies as well (4).
The wild-type virus isn't very useful, however. It does not do anything beneficial by itself, and it is impossible to directly insert a human gene sequence of any length into the viral code without rendering the virus inoperative. The key to the problem lies in the structure of the virus itself. It is composed of three major parts: the binding sites that its proteins recognize, the three genes mentioned earlier, and a terminal sequence that appears on both ends (which are used by the viral reverse transcriptase). For the virus to be effective in treating X-SCID, it only needs to add the corrected gamma-c cytokine receptor gene, and not any of the genes needed to reproduce itself. If the addition of the viral gene makes the cell hardier, then the cell's natural division will ensure spread of the added DNA. The problem then becomes to make a functional virus that doesn't contain any of the code used to replicate itself.
The solution described in Viral Vectors for Gene Transfer proceeds as follows: If a virus is manufactured that does not contain the binding site for the viral proteins, then it can be used to infect a cell, which will then produce the viral wrapper proteins. The proteins will not attach to the virus in the cell, because it doesn't have the binding site. However, if the cell also contains a sequence composed of the viral binding site followed by a copy of the desired gene, then the proteins produced by the defective virus will find the binding site on the other sequence and produce "viruses" which insert the desired gene rather than the viral ones (5).
In the experiment described in (1), the custom virus used to treat the patients' cells was in fact ordered from a commercial supplier. This is not the only option, however. Since the sequences of the MLV and the correct gamma-c cytokine receptor genes are readily available online (6, 7), it would be easy to create the necessary viral vectors in an academic laboratory.
After the Experiment:
A surprise, Leukemia, LMO-2, the FDA, an Observation.
Unfortunately, several of the patients participating in the study ended up with T-Cell Leukemia. Leukemia is a disease where the blood does not contain a high enough number of red blood cells to support the body's needs (8). When the patients' cells were examined, it appeared that the retrovirus transcribed its DNA in the middle of the LMO2 sequence in the affected cells (10). The LMO2 gene is expressed during red blood cell development (11). The problem developed because the cells with the damaged LMO2 sequence reproduced faster than the cells with normal LMO2 sequences.
Sadly, this caused the FDA to halt similar trials in the US, even though the cancer did not appear until more than three years after the initial treatments (12), and the life expectancy of X-SCID without treatment is less than one year (13).
References:
1. Fischer A, et al. (2002)Science 288, 669 "Gene Therapy of Human Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 Disease."
2. Otsu, M., and Candotti, F. (2002) Biodrugs 16 (4), 229 "Gene Therapy in Infants with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency."
3. http://author.emedicine.com/ped/topic2802.htm#section~combined_b-_and_t-cell_immunodeficiencies "White Blood Cell Function from Pediatrics ..."
4. http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/hbooks/genetics/biotech/enzymes/rt.html (2003) "Reverse Transcriptases."
5. Walther, W., and Stein, U. (2000) Drugs 60 (2), 249-271 "Viral Vectors for Gene Transfer."
6. http://genome-www2.stanford.edu/vectordb/vector_descrip/COMPLETE/MMLV.SEQ.html (2003) "Mouse Moloney murine leukemia virus MMLV - complete."
7. http://genecards.bcgsc.ca/cgi-bin/carddisp?IL2RG (2003) "Genecard for gene IL2RG GC0XM066501."
8. http://www.merck.com/pubs/mmanual/section11/chapter138/138a.htm (2003) "The Merck Manual - Sec 11, Ch. 138: Leukemias."
9. Puck, J., et al. (1996), Immunology Today, 17 (11), 507-511 "IL2RGBase: a database of gamma-c-chain defects causing human x-scid"
10. Bonetta, L. (2002), Nature Medicine, 8 (11), "Leukemia case triggers tighter gene-therapy controls."
11. http://www.infobiogen.fr/services/chromcancer/Genes/RBTN2ID34.html (2003) "Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Onocology and Haematology"
12. Check, E. (2003), Nature, 422, 7 "Cancer risk prompts US to curb gene therapy."
13. http://www.avax-tech.com/052902press.htm (2002) "Avax Technology Drug Announcement"